Connect with us

Sporting KC

Rumor: Alan Pulido will Re-Sign with Sporting KC

All the details on the length and cost. Plus, does the move make sense for Sporting Kansas City going forward.

Published

on

Daniel Salloi asking Alan Pulido for some of that money (probably) | Credit: Thad Bell

For months the discussion around Sporting Kansas City has centered on the club’s striker, Alan Pulido. He’s in a contract year and the ‘will he or won’t he’ re-sign debate has been ongoing. I had personally come down on the side of bringing him back but as a non-Designated Player. Well, it looks like part of that desire may be coming true.

Mexican journalist Kery Ruiz is reporting for outlet Football Transfers that Sporting KC are on the verge of signing a new two-year deal with their center forward for a whopping $4.4 million per season.

Per Twitter Translation:

“Chivas and Cruz Azul could not compete with Sporting’s offer. The difference was almost double what Cruz Azul offered and almost triple what Chivas offered.

They also promised him that the project keeps him as the main figure.”

The numbers are eye opening! If they are accurate, that would double his pay from the first four seasons with the team where he earned $2.2 million per season. So much for coming back on a discount after missing much of the time he’s been in Kansas City with injury.

Chivas and Cruz Azul were said to be interested as well, but they were reportedly far outbid. The “almost double” line makes it feel a bit like an overpay.

Explaining the Financial Ramifications

The response on Twitter (or should I say X?) has been surprisingly positive. There are outliers, but the general consensus seems to be he is really talented (when healthy) and its unlikely Sporting KC would find a good replacement for him since the transfer market can be incredibly hit or miss.

Part of that could be the context I added there and will add here.

In 2024, Pulido would be a Designated Player if he made $1,683,750 or a billion dollars. It doesn’t matter. It only matters to the ownership group writing the check. I was personally hoping to get him under that threshold, making him a Targeted Allocation Money (TAM) player and freeing up a spot for SKC to go out and sign another DP.

Here is a quick explainer on Designated Players (DPs) for those interested. 

If the price had risen above that $1.7m number, then the salary budget ramifications are the same. He’ll hit the budget at $683,750 and the team will have used one of it’s three DP spots occupied for the next two seasons.

Erik Thommy fills another spot (though he is under that threshold to be bought down based on the 2023 numbers) and Gadi Kinda is the team’s other DP who is out of contract after the season. Even if he re-signs, if he’s anywhere near the $918k he made in 2023, he won’t be a DP, so there will be plenty of flexibility to still make moves, including a potentially massive one. I hear Neymar is looking for a club.

Does This Move Make Sense?

Alan Pulido will be 33 years old around the start of the 2024 MLS season. Meaning he’ll nearly be 35 by the end of his contract. Prior to the 2023 MLS season, he had missed more than half the games he was under contract for due to injury. He actually missed a good chunk of the 2023 season still recovering from a surgery that kept him out all of the 2022 season.

Now that he’s healthy, he’s absolutely producing. In 20 games (18 starts) he has 10 goals and three assists in league play. The 10 goals are a high in all his seasons in KC and Sporting still have nine games to go. He’s scoring every other game, so that’s good for another four or five goals if that pace continues. He also added another goal in the US Open Cup.

If he stays healthy and keeps producing, he’s a perfect fit for this team as it’s currently constructed. But it’s a huge if. Even before arriving in Kansas City, he had a history of missing time. Though all those injuries (besides that broken arm) were relatively minor and short-term.

Staying healthy isn’t the only concern. Father time, as they say, is undefeated. Strikers tend to peak at much younger ages and it’s always a possibility Pulido declines. Then again, he’s a workout monster and seems to be getting better with age, like a fine wine.

Other, Cascading Impacts of this Move

Two things jump right out at me. One about coaching and one about Willy Agada.

First, it would seem that Peter Vermes’ job is safe. If you are letting him spend a rumored $8.8 million over two years on one guy (SKC had a total 2023 outlay of $15.4 million in 2023) you’d think he’d have a chance to put that vision to work. It’s no sure thing, but when his team has been healthy, they’ve been pretty good. The problem is they are rarely healthy which is partially aided by the age of the roster, how hard they practice, and sometimes their lack of rotation. We’ll see if they miss the playoffs in 2023 and how that impacts things going forward.

Second, Agada seems to be relegated to being the backup. He’s on a super team-friendly deal and he scored immediately upon his return from injury so it could be a good build towards the future. Let Agada sub into games consistently and shoulder some load. You get a change of pace and take some of the work off of Alan. Then Agada is ready to be the man in two more seasons (though I suspect he thinks he’s ready now).


So, what do you think of the move? Let’s discuss it in the comments. Also, on a personal note, I was out of the country for two weeks but I’m back and hopefully the content will ramp up accordingly around here. I’ve missed you all.

Since 2014, Chad Smith has been deeply involved in covering Kansas City soccer. He's written about Sporting KC, the KC Current and SKC II for numerous platforms, including The Blue Testament, which was the precursor to the KC Soccer Journal. While his initial connection to Sporting KC was established in Phoenix covering preseason, he now resides in the Kansas City area, offering thorough analysis and a strong commitment to local soccer.

18 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
KCOutsider

Honestly I’d be fine with this. He’s been extraordinary this season for SKC and I desperately wish we could replay that Toluca match with him in the lineup. Pulido is a reasonably known quantity to splash money on. I like the idea of using Agada as a super-backup and rotational regular to keep Pulido fresh (you listening, PV?).

but when his team has been healthy, they’ve been pretty good. The problem is they are rarely healthy which is partially aided by the age of the roster, how hard they practice, and sometimes their lack of rotation.

There’s the key. Will PV evolve as a manager, away from his traditional weak points?

KCOutsider

PV still seems to rotate properly only when he’s forced to. I have yet to see him execute a proper long-term roster management strategy other than “run my favorite 11 players into the ground and let the others molder behind a “break glass in case of emergency” sign.

Ian T. McFarland

I don’t love it but I don’t hate it either. What could change that is if the team feels like they have a better understanding of Pulido’s health issues today and like can move forward with less issues than we’ve experienced in his first few years.

Jake

Can’t stay the oldest roster in the league unless you re-sign your oldest players!

Dag

I was hoping we’d sell Pulido. Now we’re about to offer 4.4 million a year for a 33 year old “injury history” striker

I.. don’t think it’s great

Howlie2

4.4 million would make Pulido the 9th highest paid player in the league for 2023 based on the already released salary data. Let me list some names that would be paid less:
Zelarayan (3.8)
Gil (3.5)
Vela (3.4)
Mukhtar (3.2)
Bou (2.7)
Almada (2.3)

The list goes on (I only looked at the highest paid 25 players…it gets worse from here) but you get the idea. Is 33 year old Pulido better than those guys? Nope…not even at his prime and 33 is either past or on the cusp of being past prime.

KCOutsider

OK, that hurts. I had not placed it in a league context. Woof.

InToTouch

Pulido is definitely better than Vela, Mouktar and Bou

Howlie2

2023 stats to date: Mukhtar – 13 goals, 7 assists Vela – 8 goals, 3 assists, Pulido – 10 goals, 1 assist and Bou – 5 goals, 3 assists.

So not better than Vela or Mukhtar. Vela was the golden boot winner a few years ago with 34 goals in a season…you sure Pulido is better? Bou, I’ll give you but that dude is a bargain compared to Pulido’s price.

Howlie2

FWIW – I’m not trying to say Pulido is not a good player. He is the best striker SKC has had since I started watching this team many years ago. I like him and I’m super happy that he found his form this season. My problem is that to date he only has 53 appearances for the club. Yes, his 24 goals in that time are outstanding production, but he has only been available 42% of the time. Is this the player that SKC depends on for goal production for the next 2 seasons? From 2010- now (Pulido’s pro window) Vela has played 150 more club/national team games than Pulido. Considering Vela is 2 years older (and has many minor injuries per season), I’d say Pulido has never been durable.

Bottom line, this investment makes no sense. Can anyone seriously argue that SKC couldn’t find 2-4 young players that would surpass Pulido’s 2 year contribution for $8.8 million?

KCOutsider

I guess the question is (a) would SKC actually find those players and (b) would they play enough? It’s become a real trend for PV to not use/trust younger players, even ones he goes out and finds. PV went out and found Tzionis, then proceeded to give him splinters in favor of Shelton. Anyone seen Cam Duke or Felipe Hernandez lately? At least we know Pulido will see the field on a regular basis when he’s healthy.

Is this the best the team can do? Maybe not. Is it the best we can do while PV is managing? Probably.

Dag

8.8 million for a 33 year old striker that has only been available for half the clubs games?

Pass.

Sid Much Rock

I’m fine with this. If we’ve got Peter we need a striker who can both poach and drop back and Pulido is willing to do both. I don’t like the number. Or rather I don’t like the number means overpaying by $2M year so like $6/home game per person. But unless we’re willing to roll the dice with Agada and whatever super draft/free agent cheapo that is out there for back up, it’s probably the best move. Me personally I’m fine to roll the dice, but you all know I’m a MLS 2.0 guy who doesn’t like the arms race of the current 3.x. I’d rather have $10 tickets and be in the USL than try to compete in the Messi world. 🙂

SportsChum

Would love to see some experimentation with Pulido and Agada on at the same time.. perhaps in a 4-2-3-1

kcrews123

While I’d rather have him than not, the thing that puts a dampener on keeping him is know that Vermes is doing this because it’s comfortable and what he knows.

I legitimately thought that if we kept him, he was going to be around the $1 million mark, and that’s fine. Almost $9 million over 2 seasons though? That’s just nuts and setting us up for failure again. If he gets hurt again – which I think is more likely than not – we’re back to what a lot of people were saying last year about paying Pulido $2 million just to not play for us, only it’ll be double the amount. How are fans going to react if he gets hurt and is out for anything more than a few weeks, know that they could have gotten someone for the same total price or cheaper?

I just can’t get on board with being ok with the amount being spent, and that’s just another reason I’m all for Vermes out

Recent Comments

KC Soccer Journal in your Inbox!

Be the first to know when news breaks, sign up to get all of our posts sent directly to your inbox.

Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

18
0
Make your voice heard. Leave a comment!x
()
x