Connect with us

Sporting KC

It’s not “the next Busio”, Part I: Sporting Kansas City Academy Director Declan Jogi talks in-depth on talent recognition and development

In Part I, Sporting Kansas City Academy Director Declan Jogi discusses the Academy; Mental performance; and A to B to D. Along the way, he reveals what a “special” player is to him.

Published

on

Credit: Thad Bell Photography

When he was eight years old, Declan Jogi knew he wanted to be a professional soccer player. His native land had just declared its independence from the United Kingdom and became Zimbabwe, and, in a sense, so had Jogi. Fast forward to Jogi in the midst of fulfilling that dream: his thoughts are in the present but planning for another dream.

“I always had a passion for coaching, for teaching,” Jogi said during our Zoom interview the Tuesday evening before last. Indeed, he began earning his coaching badges during his playing career that saw him play in Zimbabwe and the United States. “I enjoy studying the game, and I enjoy interacting with young players and teaching and seeing the process. I enjoy the process, the process of development.”

Jogi first coached in Tennessee, then arrived in Kansas City to coach the Sporting Kansas City Academy  U-13s in 2015 after he left the field as a professional athlete. Then, having coached the U-14s from 2018-2022, Jogi became Sporting’s Academy director in August of 2022 after a lengthy search to find former director Jon Parry’s successor.

“You hear the old saying, ‘Find what you love, and you will never have to work a day in your life.’ I feel that way when it comes to the game of football,” he declared. “I don’t feel I’ve worked a day in my life, to be honest.”

But to hear the passion in Jogi’s voice and hear the rundown of Jogi’s daily life is to know he is driven and he puts in the “work”.

See more from Jogi and hear from Director of Community Impact Chioma Atanmo

Sporting Kansas City’s Soccer for All Kids and Academy providing life pathways

Jogi’s day begins early with wading through “[the] different departments that function in and around the academy that all need attention: facilities, player care, the coaches, the players themselves, recruiting” then immersing himself in SKC II (the 2nd team) training at 2:30 and the Academy sessions that begin an hour later, before wrapping up sometime after nightfall. Along the way, there are discussions upon discussions with all points of contact between the Academy teams and the 2nd team.

“A couple days of the week,” Jogi added, “we are at the 1st team facility [Compass Minerals National Performance Center] observing and participating in training and interacting with the 1st team staff over there.”

The goal, repeated several times by Jogi during our discussion, is clear: “to produce players to the 1st team.”

Sporting signed six players to the 1st team in 2021 who were “homegrown” in its academy: Grayson Barber, Ozzie Cisneros, Jake Davis, Kayden Pierre, Kaveh Rad, and Brooks Thompson. Only half of those – Cisneros, Davis, and Pierre – are still with the organization.

Overriding questions about Sporting’s Academy, then, include:

  1. How do Jogi and the Academy go about evaluating and developing players?
  2. What do Jogi and Academy staff look for when recruiting players?
  3. Is Sporting recognizing all the talent in its own backyard?

Talkin’ ‘bout an Evolution: How do Jogi and the Academy go about evaluating & developing players?

Jogi has been Academy Director at Sporting Kansas City for less than a year. Thus, no changes have been made as Jogi believes a solid foundation exists. A “big piece” is the “very stable” club culture based on the core values of team first, high work ethic, intelligence, and a daily pursuit of excellence.

“At this point, it is really about evolution. What is the next evolution to advance us an Academy, as a staff – coaching, players, programming, support – all of these things?”

To best see how to evolve, Jogi and his staff have been reflecting on:

  • How to best support the pathway (academy, college, etc) for every player.
  • What Jogi has done in the past.
  • What Jogi is currently doing.
  • What the Academy has done in the past, what it is doing the present, and where it is.
  • Where they want the Academy to be, where they want to go next, and how they want to get there.

The one constant for any academy is evaluating players. “The fundamentals required to be an MLS player” is one of the two baselines that Jogi and his staff consider. The other is Sporting’s player profile – the skillsets needed to play in the system (A 4-3-3 formation with a moderately high press, featuring ball possession and wide overloads to defend and create chances, generally speaking) that Sporting wants to play.

“So, we are constantly reflecting and evaluating where our players are with regards to those profiles, and even in the players that are not here, the recruiting piece of it. Recruiting to match our profile,” said Jogi. “But then for those here on the ground, how are we developing towards those skillsets?”

Talking with Declan was an enjoyable experience, and the impression one leaves with is that Sporting’s Academy is in the right hands. To allow Jogi’s unique perspectives to come through, particulars from the interview are provided via a Q and A format.

Question from KCSoccerJournal: What are the foundational abilities looked for in a player… ‘The player has to have these things…?’

Answer from Declan Jogi, Sporting KC Academy Director: The game is a simple game, right. Most people talk about four components:

  • Technical

Technically, a player needs to be able to dribble, pass, shoot, receive a ball, head a ball, and tackle at a level that he is able to compete with athletes who play the game at a high speed, to be able to do those at speed in a game that moves very quickly. There is a different speed between levels of play.  Some of that is tied to technical and tactical ability, but it is also tied to physical capacity of the athletes on the field.

  • Decision making within a tactical setting

So, you look at the ability to make decisions: How are they reading the game? Are they reactionary versus anticipatory? Are they able to work with one, two, three, four players? Are they able to work with players on their line? How do they work together? Soccer is a collective game. How are their decisions affected by their capacity to work with other players?

  • Physical

Then, you look at the physical capacity. Soccer is an athletic sport. To play at the youth level, there has to be a level of athleticism. The youth space is a little tricky because the physical component evolves a lot between the ages of 12 and 18… 19, even after that. So, that is a little more complicated piece, but you still need to project and gauge, to a degree, what a player’s athletic capacity is and could be in the future. It is not an exact science, so you look at all these pieces.

We were just discussing a player that came to tryouts at U-12 and U-13 and never made it. Then at U-14, we discovered him. But he had come, and we never noticed him. Then, at U-14, there is something different. So, there he is; he’s in the Academy.

  • Mental state/capacity

Then, the biggest part is also the hardest part to judge when recruiting. But it is one we in the Academy, especially more recently, [have emphasized]. We hired a mental performance coach. They are helping us develop curriculum to enhance our players’ mental capacity [and] their character development, which is a very important part of our core values. We try to tie those two things together to support players to be in a position to have the best chance to be successful.

A player can have the other three qualities, but lack the right mental capacity and space to be able to deal with the ups-and-downs of competitive and youth level football. A talented player could not make it because of those spaces, and a less-talented player could make it because of that space, because they have that capacity. It always has been [an important part of the game], but for us in our academy, it is a piece we already have, as a club, made some changes and strides towards supporting athletes in that space.

Sporting Kansas City Academy Prominent Extremes and In-betweens:

KCSoccerJournal: What are the foundational skills you are looking for? Is dual-footedness or how they open their body, the shape of their body when they receive the ball some of the things you are looking at when evaluating talent?

Jogi: Yes, you look at those things, but then, if you think about players, I am going to generalize, so bear with me. Give me some grace here. I am from Africa, and I’ll speak to that. A player from Africa is not always going to open his body; he is not always going to shape himself. But it doesn’t mean he hasn’t seen what is going on the opposite side of the field or behind him. He might use the protect foot to execute a turn or a pass that you don’t see coming.

Yes, you are looking at some of the basic fundamentals of the simplicity of the game: opening your body so you can see the game, playing to the lead foot; those are all very important aspects when looking at a player. But you can also teach that.

What is more difficult to teach is a player that sees a pass and is able to do something different that nobody else saw coming. And he might not be opening his body, but he has done something that nobody thought he could do because he didn’t open his body, or nobody thought he saw because he didn’t open his body. So, you have to be careful when using certain fundamentals as a measuring stick for talent.

KC Soccer Journal: When you see a player, perhaps a U-14, and think, ‘Wow, this player has some stuff our other players don’t.’ How do you elaborate on that talent? He’s special. You don’t want to mold him so much that he loses that. How does that work?

Jogi: It is a push-pull. Is it always only one way to get him to understand something or are there multiple ways to get him to understand something? Players receive information in different ways, so it is important to learn how they receive and process information. But also, to understand that they are going to develop in their own way. So, you have to have a standard; you have to have a system in place. We have a model of play, a style of play.

But within that model of play it is important to allow young players to understand the A that leads to B that leads to C. But what you don’t want to take away is the in-between the A and B. “Special” is a relative term. If a player can do from A to B to C, the logic of the game, they read the game, anticipate, they position themselves, they execute very simply. This is the logic of the game. This player is special.

But then there is the player that from A to B he can actually jump in the middle of A, turn to B, and get the ball to D. He skipped C. This is also special. Which one is special? For me, they are both special because in football all of the above are necessary to be successful.

It’s a collective game. Everybody cannot be Messi on the field. You don’t have a team that can win a game if everybody is Messi. What is special? Is special Messi or the other ten players that supported Messi and won the World Cup? To me, they are all special.


Coming Soon… Part II of It’s not “the next Busio”: Sporting Kansas City Academy Director Declan Jogi talks in-depth on talent recognition and development. Jogi discusses Technical Director and VP of Player Personnel Brian Bliss and Manager and Sporting Director Peter Vermes; recruitment; territory, including the impact of St. Louis CITY; diversity; and timing.

7 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trhen

As long as homegrown territories remain in place teams like Sporting in low talent areas will struggle to compete with consistency. Homegrown provide greater roster flexibility and help with domestic quota along with quality depth at a minimum. With expansion the open territories keep shrinking making it worse. Busio wouldn’t have even been eligible to go to Sporting if Charlotte was there and we just got half of Missouri taken away with St. Louis. You’re seeing the results with teams like Philadelphia rising recently while lacking some of the same international pull as KC.

jdkus11

As a current coach, this was really cool to read and see the Jogi’s insights on player development. I’m always talking to my boys about their mental game and it’s nice to know that I’m not crazy for spending time working on that with them. Jogi seems like he has a passion for what he’s doing and wants to build this team up. It’s time to open up those territories so he has more to work with though.

As a side note, he mentioned looking for players that “fit the system” and then referred to our 4-3-3/high press. Is it really possible to tell if a player that young can or cannot play that system? And are we missing out on other good players that don’t “fit the system?”

KCoutsider

Your second paragraph raises a question that comes up in other sports: do you draft/develop the best player possible, whether they fit your system or not, or do you draft/develop players who are pre-screened for your system?

This comes up in draft-reliant leagues like NHL, where choices are made between drafting the best available player even if you don’t need their position, vs. the best player for you even if they’re lower on the ranking.

The appeal of the latter is obvious, you start a pipeline of players that have a head start on being useful to the club, and you don’t waste time trying to change players that aren’t a good fit.

But I feel like that’s a really restrictive choice, and one that’s potentially hurting SKC. Good players can always be traded for other assets or sold onward. In the NHL context, for example, if you end up with a good defensive prospect in the minors but you’re already stacked defensively, you flip him for someone or something you do need. Rejecting that player just because you already have defensemen not only undermines a potentially worthwhile trade down the road, it also fails to recognize that the team might not be the same when that prospect is ready. Maybe existing players got hurt, or retired, or had a falling out with the coach. Maybe the coach and/or GM changed and the style of play changed.

As has been discussed elsewhere, SKC really don’t seem to do trades, and hearing that they’re focused on choosing and developing players who are right for their system seems to double down on that. Which to me seems unnecessarily restrictive. As another example, the Royals have faced criticism for having their entire minor-league pipeline apparently oriented toward producing a specific player profile, which means that if part of that pipeline isn’t working right, you’re producing generations of flawed players, not the best players possible who can always be traded.

This is getting rambly and into fanpost-land. But it really bugs me to see teams like SKC and the Royals seeming to have an overly restrictive philosophy rather than a more open-ended transactional one. I don’t have time to edit this down to a more coherent argument, hope it made sense.

David Greenwald

You’ve hit on all the things I was going to mention. I think the team needs to take the best possible players available. One of the things a good club should do is develop talent that can play multiple styles. Obviously we’d prefer to function a certain way, but being able to adapt and thrive is good.

But we talk about how shrewd Vermes was in the past with the rules and inefficiencies that other people weren’t exploiting. Not developing and selling talent to the USL or other clubs is an area where we’re missing out. Sell guys like Ethan Bryant to Indy Eleven for $50k. I’m just picking a random player and random amont of money. But let’s pretend like he’s a fringe first teamer but would thrive in the USL. SELL HIM and reinvest the money. It’s an opportunity to advertise the academy and make some cash.

WonderfulWizHeWas

Great article. Jogi is passionate about what he does, but is he really good at what he does? Granted, the native talent in this region is less than other parts of the country due to many factors including sports culture, population density and the countries of origin of the available players. But there have been exceedingly few players developed through the academy that did not get recruited to move to KC specifically to play in the academy.

David Greenwald

FWIW, he’s brand new. So any failures of the academy can’t really be put on him

WonderfulWizHeWas

Understood. But it is still more of the same from the SKC organization. Promote from within a culture that hasn’t had a solid track record of developing homegrown players that have not been targeted to move to KC to join the academy. Just one more “yes man” to support Vermes’ failing regime. No new ideas. No management experience beyond overseeing specific age groups within the academy. It doesn’t foster a sense of hope and excitement for the future of the academy.

Recent Comments

KC Soccer Journal in your Inbox!

Be the first to know when news breaks, sign up to get all of our posts sent directly to your inbox.

Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

7
0
Make your voice heard. Leave a comment!x
()
x